“We’re Number One” Musical Journey, this Friday, on BounceRadio.net…

8 02 2010

Looking forward to Friday’s Musical Journey. After doing the “One Hit Wonders” special last month, I’m taking things to the other extreme this time around, with the “We’re Number One” Musical Journey: three hours of songs that have achieved the ultimate chart success in the US: reaching the #1 spot of Billboard’s Hot 100.

In my research, I have found a number of songs that have reached the magical #1 spot, like Eagles’ “Hotel California”, or “Smooth” by Santana with Rob Thomas. And I found the ultimate resource for these number ones: a page on Wikipedia that lists, by year, every song that topped the Hot 100 since Billboard Magazine introduced the chart in 1958:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_number-one_hits_(United_States)

I am taking requests for number ones for Friday. Drop me a line at todd@BounceRadio.net and let me know what you’d like to hear. If it is indeed a number one on the Wikipedia list, it qualifies, and it does not necessarily have to be what is now considered classic rock! As long as it was a number one, it could be on the show!

Join me on Friday for the “We’re Number One” Musical Journey, 7pm Eastern, 4pm Pacific, where The World Listens To Internet Radio: BounceRadio.net.





In honour of Sunday’s Super Bowl: football-themed Cake Wrecks…

4 02 2010

In past entries on this blog, I have talked about a great blog by Jen Yates, called “Cake Wrecks”, in which Yates posts pictures of “When Professional Cakes Go Horribly, Hilariously Wrong”.

In honour of this Sunday’s Super Bowl, Jen has put up a series of Wrecks involving the ol’ pigskin and the teams that throw said pigskin around.

Instead of describing these cakes (I could never do them justice), here’s the link to the page on Jen’s blog:

http://cakewrecks.blogspot.com/2010/02/whats-that-spell.html





Not going to be a fun month…

2 02 2010

Please bear with me, friends.

Particularly, since I’ve been in this wheelchair, the month of February has been one of my least favourite months, for a number of reasons:

1. As Wiarton Willie indicated this morning (it’s Feb. 2, Groundhog Day as I write this), we’re in for six more weeks of winter, apparently, as Willie did see his shadow. Winter is my least favourite of seasons, because wheelchairs and snow simply do not get along, and it’s too cold for me to be comfortable anywhere but indoors.

Summer is my second-least favourite season, but there’s no need to go there right now.

2. Valentine’s Day: for those of you for whom this occasion actually has some meaning, I wish you all the best. I won’t be sharing in that myself, however. The last time I’d had a girlfriend was way back when I was in high school, and with the condition I’m in right now, and the fact that I was (at best) inept socially even before the wheelchair, my chances of finding someone to share my life, and therefore finding some meaning to Valentine’s Day, are nil.

3. My birthday is this month. I used to be able to tolerate my birthday, but that was, again, before the wheelchair found me. Now it only serves to remind me that I’m one year older, and that the past year, there wasn’t a whole hell of a lot to cheer about. And pardon my pessimism, but I don’t see a lot to cheer about in the coming year, either.

Maybe I should find a nice big rock to hide under until March 1st. Does anyone have such a rock that I can borrow?

Until then, again, folks, please bear with me. I know I’m in for a rough ride this month.





Ch-ch-ch-changes…hopefully for the better…

1 02 2010

Sunday was a very significant day for Toronto Maple Leafs fans. The Leafs have been struggling big time so far this season. One of the cellar-dwellers in the National Hockey League, only one team has being faring worse than the Leafs to this point in the season.

After the Leafs once again blew a significant lead: this time, coughing up 5 straight goals after taking a 3-0 lead, in a 5-3 loss to the Vancouver Canucks Saturday, general manager Brian Burke pulled the trigger on two major trades Sunday, bringing top defenceman Dion Phaneuf and veteran goaltender Jean-Sebastien Giguere to Toronto.

The trades involved a total of 10 players: Burke sent four players to Calgary to get Phaneuf plus two others; and then later traded a pair to Anaheim to pick up Giguere.

Both of these trades make good sense to me. A shakeup in Leafs Land was indeed necessary. And in the process, Burke picked up a couple of players that could help turn the fortunes of a struggling hockey club, and in so doing, Burke has indeed put his stamp on the club since taking over as the Leafs’ President and GM in November 2008. Granted, the turnaround is likely too late to help Toronto’s fortunes for this season, but these deals could very well help the club down the road, in a way we don’t yet know.

In the meantime, Phaneuf will certainly help on the blue line, likely forming half of one defensive pair, with Tomas Kaberle heading up another pair. And I have to think that Giguere will become the Leafs’ number one goaltender. Vesa Toskala was certainly not getting the job done (hence his ticket to Anaheim to bring Giguere to Toronto), and Jonas Gustavsson, while showing times of brilliance, is too young and too inconsistent to be the number one netminder. Meanwhile, Giguere is a proven backstop and should take on the bulk of goaltending duties for the remainder of the season.

And I don’t think that Burke has finished wheeling and dealing. There have been indications that at least one more trade is in the works.

“Stay tuned.”





The new iPad and the visually-impaired: sharing a blog from a fellow “tweeter”

30 01 2010

Hi, friends,

A blog from someone I know on Twitter has been brought to my attention and I felt that this should be shared with as many as can access it.

The blog is from Cathy Browne, @cathybrowne on Twitter, who has some suggestions to Apple, on how the iPad would be a greater benefit for the visually-impaired.

You can see the blog here:

http://cathybrowne.com/?p=362

Please have a look and share this blog. And thanks!





Future Hall Of Famer still thinks of Toronto as second home…

28 01 2010

Today’s Globe and Mail has a neat article (which you can see here) about former Toronto Blue Jay and future baseball Hall Of Famer Roberto Alomar.

It describes Alomar’s feelings about leaving Toronto – the city he describes as his second home – and how he gave the Blue Jays every opportunity to hang on to him by matching the offer made to him by the Baltimore Orioles. Unfortunately, the Jays, who were in a definite rebuilding mode, declined, and Alomar became an Oriole.

It is well known how Alomar just missed being elected to Cooperstown this year, his first year of eligibility. And in the article is a comment on how an incident between Alomar and umpire John Hirschbeck – an incident for which Hirschbeck has since forgiven Alomar and the two, in fact, have become friends – is the reason some of those responsible for electing players to the Hall Of Fame chose not to vote for Alomar this year.

Alomar is one of the best second basemen that the game of baseball has ever seen, and he deserved to be elected this year. It is a shame that an incident that the participants themselves have put behind them still became a factor in Alomar not getting into the Hall Of Fame this year.

But there is good news regarding Alomar in this piece. It mentions the upcoming induction of Alomar to the Canadian Baseball Hall Of Fame. That induction ceremony is in June.

Also, there are indications that Roberto may be rejoining the Blue Jays fraternity very soon. According to general manager Alex Anthopolous, Alomar is on a list of guest coaches who could be working with the Jays at spring training in February.

It would be really cool if Alomar, who’s expressed an interest in re-entering the game as an instructor, were to do so within the Blue Jays organization. The players in the organization would stand to learn a lot from one of the best in the game.

And fear not – it is, the article says, a “virtual lock” that Roberto Alomar will be inducted into the Hall Of Fame in 2011.





The dismantling of Citytv…

19 01 2010

Tuesday was a sad day in Canadian television, particularly for those who were laid off as a result of the “restructuring” of the Rogers-owned Citytv stations across Canada.

Rogers Communications has cut some 60 people – about 6 percent of their workforce: on-air personalities and behind-the-scenes staff – from their Citytv stations in Toronto, Edmonton, Calgary and Vancouver (somehow, the Winnipeg affiliate is unaffected by the job cuts), including some well-known on-air talent: Anne Mroczkowski, Lara Di Battista and and Pam Seatle no longer have jobs at Citytv in Toronto. A number of news shows have been discontinued, while Breakfast Television and Cityline will still air, although BT will be shortened at some stations.

The not-so-pleasant details of the cuts can be seen here and here.

Ever since Rogers took over the Citytv stations a few years ago, as part of a major restructuring of the world of broadcasting in Canada, that saw the takeover of the former CHUM Television-owned specialty stations and A-Channel affiliates (rebranded as, simply, “A”) by CTVGlobeMedia, the Citytv stations that were once, in my view, the most vibrant stations on the dial (especially when there was just the original Citytv in Toronto, and it stood alone as being a very different channel compared to the others), have become mere shadows of their former selves.

It was asked by someone on Twitter that if Rogers, which has lots of money because of the cable empire (read: monopoly) they enjoy in much of Canada, has felt the need to make these cuts, what does it say for the other Canadian networks, who operate more stations than the five owned by Rogers?

I shudder at the thought.

UPDATE, January 22, 2010: Steve Faguy wrote in his Fagstein blog yesterday about the layoffs at Citytv. You can read it here.





A new look at the Star Trek universe – worth seeing!

18 01 2010

Due to varying circumstances, until recently, I have not been able to purchase any new DVDs for my collection for a while. Not long ago, for the first time in several months, I finally was able to add to my collection, with the re-imagined edition of Star Trek, directed by J.J. Abrams.

Being pretty much a life-long fan of Star Trek, when it was first made known back in 2007 that a new Trek film was in the works with Abrams at the helm, I must admit, my first reaction was one of concern. Ever since the first series debuted (before I was born, admittedly, though I watched it in regular reruns as a kid), I had seen Star Trek as a vision of either Trek creator Gene Roddenberry or “spin-off series” co-executive producer/executive producer/co-creator Rick Berman, and in the 10 Star Trek films that preceded this 2009 release. I was worried at how a new set of eyes would look at the Star Trek universe.

Abrams has impressive credentials as a producer/director, his credits including Alias, Fringe and Lost. The new Trek looked to be in good hands, and it eventually became interesting to me how the Trek universe would look from another’s point of view.

Abrams and company did not disappoint.

The film stays fairly true to what we already know of the world of Star Trek. The basic shape of the re-imagined Enterprise is very familiar, and yet there are some significant changes in its overall look. And, as one of my friends described it recently, the interior is a bit more “industrial” than what we saw back in the 1960s. But the crew uniforms, though updated, are still in the familiar colours from the original series: gold for command, blue for science/medical and red for operations (communications and engineering, for example).

The casting of the younger versions of the Enterprise crew was excellent. My favourite casting decision was to have New Zealand actor Karl Urban (aka Eomer in the last two installments of The Lord Of The Rings) take on the role of Dr. Leonard “Bones” McCoy. This had to have been a challenge for Urban as an actor, having to turn in his New Zealand accent for the southern drawl of the Enterprise chief medical officer. And he nailed it! DeForest Kelley, the original Dr. McCoy, would have been pleased.

The story was very entertaining, involving a certain concept in time travel, in which we see two versions of Mr. Spock: the young officer played by Zachary Quinto, and the Ambassador known as Spock Prime, played by Leonard Nimoy. Quinto portrayed the younger Spock very well, and Nimoy, who applauded Quinto’s selection to be the younger version of the legendary Vulcan, was vintage Nimoy.

In terms of storyline, when I first saw the movie, I was a little confused, when certain characters (like Spock’s mother, Amanda) faced events that were unexpected, but after viewing the film a number of times, I realized that since a major portion of the story deals with time travel and what can happen when people from the future find themselves in the past, the events we see make more sense and, in effect, set up a whole new realm of directions the Trek universe could take – and therefore, open up the possibility for more Star Trek films. In fact, it has indeed been announced that there are plans for a sequel to this film, currently slated for sometime in 2012, in which Abrams is expected to be the producer.

If you’re a longtime Trek fan and haven’t yet seen this new incarnation, I urge you to do so. There’s plenty that’s familiar in the movie to keep you interested, plus a few pleasant surprises. And if you’re new to the Trek universe, this film is a good way to introduce you to Star Trek.

The movie is available as either a single DVD, a “Special Edition” 2-disc DVD set with a good number of bonus features, and a 3-disc “Special Edition” Blu-Ray set. Either way, I believe, it’s worth the purchase.





“One Hit Wonders” Musical Journey this Friday!

14 01 2010

Whew! I didn’t realize what I was getting myself into when I announced this.

On Over The Hump Wednesday night, I announced that, for the first themed Musical Journey of 2010, I’m dedicating Friday’s show to the one hit wonder – 3 full hours of them!

But little did I realize how difficult it would be to whittle things down to 3 hours of one hit wonders, especially when there are a number of definitions for one hit wonders. And thus, what is a one hit wonder to some may not be so to others. So, before I started looking through the lists I’ve seen online, I had to set a firm set of criteria myself.

I decided that, even though I’m in Canada, since BounceRadio is an American station, my list should be based on what is considered a one hit wonder stateside. I also defined, for the purposes of my show, a one hit wonder as an artist or band who had one and only one song that reached the top 40 of Billboard’s Hot 100 chart, regardless of success on any other chart or in any other country.

While I felt this to be a good limit to work with, it did reveal a few surprises: some artists who had done well in other parts of the world, such as Canada or the UK, but had just the one song to make the top 40, and therefore qualified for my list. Others were well known in other genres, such as country music, but again had the single song that crossed over to the Billboard chart.

You’ll hear samples of both instances on the show Friday. There are many artists that you will recognize as one hit wonders, but some of the artists will surprise you. But that is not necessarily a bad thing.

At the same time, there were a number of what otherwise would be one hit wonders, except for the fact that they had one or more additional songs that, though they barely made it, cracked the top 40, and therefore, had to be disqualified from my show. But even with these artists not appearing, I believe you’ll hear a good sample of one hit wonders this week.

The “One Hit Wonders” Musical Journey airs Friday, January 15, at 7pm Eastern, 4pm Pacific, and you’re invited to join me! Just go to www.BounceRadio.net and click “BounceRadio Music” to tune in and join our live chat.

See you then!





Glad to be back to watching the news again. Thanks Global Toronto!

1 01 2010

And here we go, folks – the first look “through Jim Todd’s eyes…” for 2010! One resolution for the New Year: to be more active with my blogging. Prior to today, I had been rather quiet. Hoping that will change for 2010!

One of the things I’m very thankful as we head into 2010 is the group of friendships I have gained over the past year, via Twitter and Facebook, and also by my taking part in the live blog for Global Toronto’s News Hour Final.

Though there was a time earlier in the past decade when I didn’t really watch any news at all, when I returned to watching the news, and also in the previous years, Global News has been my news source of choice, and has been pretty much for as long as I can remember.

My memories of Global News go all the way back to the early years, when Peter Trueman anchored the national edition, which then aired at 11pm. And in later years, Mike Anscombe and John Dawe were the primary anchors, along with Bob McAdorey as the weather presenter.

My strongest memory about Global’s news coverage was Kevin Newman’s work for Global National in 2001. Newman had become the anchor of that newscast just a week before 9/11. Newman did an outstanding job of covering the attacks and the aftermath. Thinking about it now, working with the late Peter Jennings at ABC prior to returning to Canada really helped him with his coverage of 9/11, and his work during that time was one of the reasons I chose Global National as my national newscast.

Earlier in 2009, Global Toronto extended its late evening newscast, News Final, to a full hour, and added an interactive component: the Live Blog. It was this new feature that got me interested in the news again, after a couple of years away due to my disability. Not only did you get a chance to meet other Global News viewers online in a discussion of the news we were watching, you also were able to get to know a number of great folks at Global: Leslie Roberts, who for some time anchored both of Global’s evening newscasts before sticking with the 6pm newscast for the time being; Carolyn MacKenzie, who has taken the reins of News Hour Final for now; meteorologist Anthony Farnell; weather presenter (and I understand, soon to be a full-fledged meteorologist himself) Bill Coulter, plus a number of behind-the-scenes folks who moderate the blog during the newscast. It’s been great getting to know these people in the Global Blog (now affectionately known as the “Glog”), who I would like to consider as new friends.

I am glad to be back to watching Global News again. And if you’re in Ontario and are looking for a newscast to watch, do check out Global News: Global National at 5:30 (all times Eastern), News Hour at 6pm, and News Hour Final at 11pm.